Comparison of a simple latex agglutination test with hemolysis-in-gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay for detection of rubella virus antibodies.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Rubella virus antibodies were measured in 300 sera from pregnant women visiting a maternity center by using a new, simple latex test, Rubalex. The results were compared with those obtained by using hemolysis in gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay. The sensitivity of the latex test was 100, 98.0, and 99.6% when compared with hemolysis in gel, hemagglutination inhibition, and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Its comparative specificity was 96.2, 95.7, and 90.7%, and the predictive value of a positive result was 99.2, 99.2, and 98%, respectively. When assayed with the British standard anti-rubella serum its sensitivity was 11 IU/ml. The latex test gave a positive result within 2 min, and 87% of the positive samples had already reacted after 1 min. The negative results remained as such for at least 8 min. No prozone effect was observed for sera with hemagglutination inhibition titers from 256 to 2,048. We concluded that the latex test, Rubalex, was readily applicable for measuring rubella immunity with a reaction time of 2 min in undiluted samples.
منابع مشابه
Evaluation of a Latex Agglutination Test for Detection of Antibodies to Rubella Virus in Selected Sera
A new latex agglutination test for rubella virus was used to test sera with a hemagglutination inhibition titer of -8 (97 specimens) or >256 (158 specimens). Maximum latex agglutination test sensitivity was achieved when low-titer sera were tested undiluted and high-titer sera were diluted (1:10). A modification of the protocol of the manufacturer resulted in a latex agglutination-hemagglutinat...
متن کاملEvaluation of a latex agglutination test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus in selected sera.
A new latex agglutination test for rubella virus was used to test sera with a hemagglutination inhibition titer of less than or equal to 8 (97 specimens) or greater than or equal to 256 (158 specimens). Maximum latex agglutination test sensitivity was achieved when low-titer sera were tested undiluted and high-titer sera were diluted (1:10). A modification of the protocol of the manufacturer re...
متن کاملComparison of the latex agglutination test with the hemagglutination inhibition test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and neutralization test for detection of antibodies to rubella virus.
The ability of a rapid, latex agglutination test to diagnose rubella infection and to measure immune status was evaluated by comparison with the hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the neutralization (NT) test. The latex agglutination test accurately detected serological conversions in 74 pairs of sera representing 21 natural infections and 53 ...
متن کاملEvaluation of the hemolysis-in-gel test for the screening of rubella immunity and the demonstration of recent infection.
The hemolysis-in-gel method for detection of antibodies to rubella virus gave results which correlated well with results of hemagglutination inhibition and neutralization tests. With a diffusion time of 24 or 48 h, a linear correlation was obtained between the logarithm of antibody concentration and the diameter of the hemolytic zone. Fourfold, and even twofold, differences in serum antibody co...
متن کاملComparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and passive latex agglutination for determination of rubella immune status.
Hemagglutination inhibition, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and passive latex agglutination were used to test 495 human serum samples for determination of rubella immunity. Overall agreements for immune status were as follows: hemagglutination inhibition versus ELISA, 94.7% (469 of 495); hemagglutination inhibition versus passive latex agglutination (1:10 dilution), 99.2% (491 of 49...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical microbiology
دوره 21 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1985